Saving us from Facebook

Forcing us to be on facebook to use spotify is bullshit.

Facebook being a monopoly is a problem for us all. One organisation with all of that information showing a clear intent to move into every area of our lives is problematic.

Google achieve the same but they do it by being better than their competition. Facebook achieve it by being better at one stage and achieving a critical mass. It was a land grab and they now have gathered up, for free, a very valuable commodity and can do pretty much what they want with it.

The other week David Mitchell suggested nationalising it.

Obviously that can't really work, though it would be nice.

What I want is for the WC3 to develop the tools to break up Facebook's unfair advantage in human capital and open them up to competition.

Your details and their ability to advertise to you is the price of the service. You should be able to take those details anywhere you like and still have access. So we need to develop technology such that, for instance, your facebook profile can interact easily with somebody else's google+ profile or bebo profile. These guys compete to offer a service in terms of the organisation of your details and interactions with friends. essentially they can all have different front ends but the data is essentially the same.

This is what the web and the WC3 has always been about. Setting data standards so that different networks can understand each other easily.

So if the WC3 sets standards for saving your, personal details AND for interactions with Flickr, facebook and the rest... It should be possible for you to have one profile which you can take and leave anywhere you like. If you prefer to use google+ but your friends won't move from facebook it should be possible for you to interact with their facebook profile from your google+ profile.

If you create an event on google+ it is stored there but then you can invite friends who are storing their profile on facebook.

Are you with me? This should not be beyond the whit of the sexy web-geeks. Though facebook might not be willing to sign up I would bet others would. AND if their free'er service proved to be better it would present a much more attractive draw to people than google+ is currently. I would even expect google to put money behind organising the community in the way some do for Linux fixes.

The internet wants and needs to be free. Don't let the robber barrons win.

Right I'm off to post this on Facebook.

national identity

National identity is a particularly boring subject that gets too much air-time. But I'll say this much. My national identity is primarily British Islands writ large and I think if people really thought about it most other people's is too . The major cultural drivers which make me who I am are I believe shared across Irish, Scottish, Welsh and English areas.

That isn't to say that there aren't significant differences but all countries have those and in some cases they are as stark between the north and south of any of the home nations as between them.

Irish, scottish, english folk musics are nuanced but certainly from the same root. A large chunk and possibly most of my friends at primary school came from Irish and Scottish families. The islanders watch the same TV, listen to the same music, speak the same language (if only as a second language for a few), eat pretty similarly and fortify ourselves with tea & beer in similar amounts, have similar judicial systems and most of our families and friends stretch between different bits of our little damp islands.

I write this post in part, not just because of the similarities, but because the breaking up of attributes seems to snatch at shared identities meaning for instance that Yorkshiremen can't be dour, nope the Scots took that...

And because its usually the English working and lower middle classes left with the crumbs or worse identified by the gentry, pimms, rowing and village greens, which whilst lovely, make up a very small portion of the population or our past-times.

If my cultural identity were an ice cream European would be the cone, the ice cream would be british isles and the sprinkles would be English, Lancastrian, Blackpudlian.

The sprinkles are great. I love sprinkles and the Welsh for instance get a whole new kind of flake because they have their own language. But it's the ice cream and the cone that make up the most of it and spending too much time wondering exactly how my sprinkles differ from yours seems daft.

I don't want to give you the impression that I'm not aware of or that I don't enjoy the great diversity across the islands. But neither do I think that diversity is particularly special as compared to other similar sized countries. Such that I increasingly feel that telling a foreigner that I'm English, as opposed to British, is a little similar to the way a Londoner, when asked will tell you that they are from e.g. Ealing. Which always makes them sound like twats on the radio.

The Republic of Ireland is a separate country clearly so saying you're Irish is not the same. But I would say that my personal identity is such that if they decided they wanted to unite Eire with the rest of the islands and have a federal British isles with devolved governments in each state. AND we subsequently moved the main Federal government to Dublin... I would be pretty surprised but I would have no problem with that... and in fact... I quite like the idea.... ooo and we could elect a non politician as Monarch on a bi-annual basis. I vote Stephen Fry.